The working question behind this site is whether reality is there regardless of any observer, or whether what we call "reality" is, at least in part, structured by the fact that something is conscious of it. This isn't a new question — it's the line running from Kant's distinction between the thing-in-itself and appearance, through the realism/idealism debates it provoked, into contemporary arguments about whether perception reveals a mind-independent world or partly constructs the one we take ourselves to be perceiving. The papers here work that question from specific angles rather than trying to settle it in general: personal identity and free will are both, underneath, questions about how much of what looks like a fixed fact about a person is actually observer-dependent.
Each paper is built the same way: one claim, stated once, defended against the strongest objection available, in dialogue with the actual literature rather than in isolation from it. Nothing here is meant to stand as a finished position — it's meant to be read the way a philosophy paper is read, by someone looking for where it breaks.
Sorted by whether the paper argues about what exists (Metaphysics) or about what can be known of it (Epistemology) — both in service of the same underlying question above.
I came to philosophy from IT, with a postgraduate focus on cybersecurity, and I'm currently completing a master's in the same field. The move isn't a rejection of that training — it's the same instinct for exact, defensible claims, redirected at a different set of questions, and this archive is where that standard gets tested in public: short papers, one claim each, defended against the best objection I could find, posted only once they're ready to be disagreed with.
Two earlier manuscripts, I — The Unseen Truth and an unfinished Nepali work, sit outside this site's scope. They're reflective rather than argued, and were written before formal exposure to the discipline. The papers above are the newer and more relevant body of work.
For comments on any working paper above — agreement is not required, disagreement is preferred if it's specific.
anupam.mahatra108@gmail.com